Designing and Analyzing Properties of Socio-Culture and Perception from Livestock Farmers: An Evidence in Utilizing Oil Palm Plantation Land-Use of West Papua
PDF
EPUB
HTML

Keywords

Socio-cultural productivity;
Farmer perception;
Utilization of free rearing land;
Oil palm plantation;
Manokwari

How to Cite

Iyai, D. A., Ako, A., Runtuboi, Y. Y., Sirajuddin, S. N., Dimara, P. A., Nohong, B., Auri, A., Panambe, N., Pakage, S., & Benu, N. M. H. (2024). Designing and Analyzing Properties of Socio-Culture and Perception from Livestock Farmers: An Evidence in Utilizing Oil Palm Plantation Land-Use of West Papua. Agricultural & Rural Studies, 2(2), 0010. https://doi.org/10.59978/ar02020010

Abstract

This study aims to examine the socio-cultural productivity and perceptions of farmers in the utilization of free-rearing land in the oil palm plantation area in Manokwari. The research was conducted using survey methods and structured interviews with breeders who indulge livestock on oil palm plantations and other grazing lands. The results of the study show that socio-cultural productivity in the utilization of free-rearing land in the oil palm plantation area in Manokwari is still low. Factors such as the lack of knowledge and skills of farmers in managing free-rearing land and limited access to resources and information are the main obstacles in increasing productivity. Breeders' perceptions of the use of free-rearing land also vary. Some farmers see wasteland as an alternative feed source with the potential to improve livestock health and productivity, while others see it as an unproductive area and tend to be neglected. This perception is influenced by factors such as education level, farmer experience, and support from related parties. In order to increase socio-cultural productivity and utilization of wasteland in oil palm plantations, comprehensive efforts are needed. Increasing the knowledge and skills of breeders in managing free-rearing land, better access to resources and information, as well as the active role of related parties in providing assistance and support to breeders are key factors in achieving this.

https://doi.org/10.59978/ar02020010
PDF
EPUB
HTML

References

Aritonang, S. Roza, E., & Tama, S. H. (2019). The potentials of palm oil plantation wastes as animal feed at traditional farming in Teras Terunjam Subdistrict Muko-Muko District. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak Universitas Padjadjaran, 18(2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.24198/jit.v18i2.20757

Ayantunde, A. A., de Leeuw, J., Turner, M. D., & Said, M. (2011). Challenges of assessing the sustainability of (agro)-pastoral systems. Livestock Science, 139(1–2), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.019

Belay, A., Oludhe, C., Mirzabaev, A., Recha, J. W. , Berhane, Z., Osano, P. M. , Demissie, T., Olaka, L. A., & Solomon, D. (2022). Knowledge of climate change and adaptation by smallholder farmers: Evidence from Southern Ethiopia. Heliyon, 8(12), Article e12089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12089

Bell, L. W., Moore, A. D., & Thomas, D. T. (2018). Integrating diverse forage sources reduces feed gaps on mixed crop-livestock farms. Animal, 12(9), 1967–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117003196

Boogaard, B. K. (2009). The Socio-Cultural Sustainability of Animal Farming : An Inquiry into Social Perceptions of Dairy Farming in the Netherlands and Norway(Publication No. 28237760). [Doctoral dissertation, Wageningen University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Campos, M., Velázquez, A., & McCall, M. (2014). Adaptation strategies to climatic variability: A case study of small-scale farmers in rural Mexico. Land Use Policy, 38, 533–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.12.017

Le Thi Minh, C., Lebailly, P., & Tran Quang, T. (2017). Enhancing farmers’ market power and income in the pig value chain; a case study in Bac Giang province, Vietnam. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 29(12), 13.

Cortner, O., Garrett, R. D., Valentim, J. F., Ferreira, J., Niles, M. T., Reis, J., & Gil, J. (2019). Perceptions of integrated crop-livestock systems for sustainable intensification in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy, 82, 841–53.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.006

Dady, Z., Kaunang, C. L., & Tulung, Y. L. R. (2018). Potensi pengembangan Ternak sapi potong dengan pola integrasi kelapa-sapi di Kecamatan Tabaru Kabupaten Halmahera Barat. Agri-Sosioekonomi, 14(1), 335–46.

https://doi.org/10.35791/agrsosek.14.1.2018.19557

Ediset, E., Jaswandi, J., Heriyanto, E., & Basyar, B. (2017). Peningkatan produktivitas Peternak sapi di daerah transmigrasi Lubuk Aur Sitiung I Kabupaten Dharmasraya. LOGISTA - Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(1), 11–19.

https://doi.org/10.25077/logista.1.1.11-19.2017

Far, Z., & Yakhler, H. (2015). Typology of cattle farming systems in the semi-arid region of Setif: Diversity of productive directions, Livestock Research for Rural Development, 27(6), 2015.

Firth, C., Maye, D., & Pearson, D. (2011). Developing “community” in community gardens. Local Environment, 16(6), 555–68.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2011.586025

Hamilton, H., Henry, R., Rounsevell, M., Moran, D., Cossar, F., Allen, K., Boden, L., & Alexander, P. (2020). Exploring global food system shocks, scenarios and outcomes. Futures, 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102601

Hosseini, M., Shahrbabak, H. M., Zandi, M. B., & Fallahi, M. H. (2016). A morphometric survey among three Iranian horse breeds with multivariate analysis. Media Peternakan, 39(3), 155–60. https://doi.org/10.5398/medpet.2016.39.3.155

Iyai, D. A., Marani, O., Marjen, T., & Usior, L. (2013). Pig farming performances of three Papuan tribes: Case study of Byak, Onate and Arfak Tribes in Papua Barat. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture, 38(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.14710/jitaa.38.1.55-64

Kauber, K., Fowler, H., Lipton, B., Meschke, J. S., & Rabinowitz, P. (2017). Salmonella knowledge, attitudes and practices: A survey of backyard poultry owners residing in Seattle, Washington and the surrounding metropolitan area. Zoonoses and Public Health, 64(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12274

Kauppinen, T., Valros, A., & Vesala, K. M. (2013). Attitudes of dairy farmers toward cow welfare in relation to housing, management and productivity. Anthrozoos, 26(3), 405–20. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303713X13697429463718

Kebebe, E. (2019). Bridging technology adoption gaps in livestock sector in Ethiopia: A innovation system perspective. Technology in Society, 57, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.12.002

Marandure, T., Dzama, K., Bennett, J., Makombe, G., Chikwanha, O., & Mapiye, C. (2020). Farmer challenge-derived indicators for assessing sustainability of low-input ruminant production systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2020.100060

Molina-Flores, B., Velasco, G., Loza,S., & Soliman, I. (2012). Socio-cultural factors determining roles and responsibilities in traditional cattle production systems within rural communities of Upper Egypt. In I. Casasús, J. Rogoši, A. Rosati, I. Štokoviç, & D. Gabiña (Eds.), Animal farming and environmental interactions in the Mediterranean region (pp. 241–247). Wageningen Academic Publishers.

https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-741-7_30

Mukhopadhyay, D. (2009). Cultural values, indigenous knowledge for climate change adaptations in developing countries. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 6(57). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1307/6/7/572006

Ozcatalbas, O., Akcaoz, H., Firat, M. Z., & Kutlar, I. (2010). The analysis of socio-economic factors in the dairy farming of Antalya Province of Turkey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 9(1), 20–26.

Paris, T. R. (2002). Crop-animal systems in Asia: Socio-economic benefits and impacts on rural livelihoods. Agricultural Systems, 71(1–2),

–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00041-5

Pasandaran, E. (2006). Alternatif Kebijakan Pengendalian Konversi Lahan Sawah Beririgasi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian, 25(4), 123–129.

Patel, S. J., Patel, J. H., Patel, A., & Gelani, R. N. (2016). Role of women gender in livestock sector: A review. Journal of Livestock Science, 7, 92–96. https://livestockscience.in/wp-content/uploads/gender-livestock.pdf

Praza, R. (2016). Optimalisasi cyber extension dalam pembangunan pertanian di era Mea. Prosiding Seminar Nasional BKS PTN Wilayah Barat Bidang Ilmu Pertanian, 200–204. http://repository.unimal.ac.id/2913/1/Optimalisasi Cyber Extension Dalam Pembangunan.pdf

Quisumbing, A. R. (1996). Male-female differences in agricultural productivity: Methodological issues and empirical evidence. World Development, 24(10), 1579–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00059-9

Sekaran, U., Lai, L., Ussiri, D. A. N., Kumar, S., & Clay, S. (2021). Role of integrated crop-livestock systems in improving agriculture production and addressing food security – A review. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 5.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100190

Shamna, A., Biswas, P., Jha, S. K., Sarkar, S., & Kumar, S. (2018). Tribal farm women’s participation in agriculture and factors influencing it: Evidence from West Bengal, India. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 20(5), 911–22.

Shikuku, K. M., Winowiecki, L., Twyman, J., Eitzinger, A., Perez, J. G., Mwongera, C., & Läderach, P. (2017). Smallholder farmers’ attitudes and determinants of adaptation to climate risks in East Africa. Climate Risk Management, 16, 234–45.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.03.001

Sudirman, A., Amrullah, A. & Hamdani, A. (2021). Model pengembangan ternak ruminansia di lahan kering untuk mendukung sektor peternakan di kabupaten Sumbawa. Jurnal Riset Kajian Teknologi Dan Lingkungan, 4(2), 268–80.

Suradisastra, K., & Lubis, A. M. (2000). Aspek gender dalam kegiatan usaha peternakan. Jurnal Wartazoa, 10(1), 13–19.

Ugochukwu, A. I., & Phillips, P. W. B. (2018). From Agriscience to Agribusiness. In N. Kalaitzandonakes, E. Carayannis, E. Grigoroudis, & S. Rozakis (Eds.), Technology Adoption by Agricultural Producers: A Review of the Literature (pp. 361–377). Innovation, Technology and Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67958-7_17

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Deny Anjelus Iyai, Ambo Ako, Yubelince Yustenci Runtuboi, Sitti Nurani Sirajuddin, Petrus Abraham Dimara, Budiman Nohong, Amilda Auri, Novita Panambe, Stepanus Pakage, Nithanel M. H. Benu

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.