Bayesian Data Fusion Framework for Soil Moisture Interpolation in Entre Ríos, Argentina: Analysis of Topographic Indices
PDF
XML
HTML

Keywords

soil moisture
spatial variability
geostatistics
Ordinary Kriging
topography

How to Cite

Aguirre, C. A., Rondán, G. A., Sedano, C. G., Cardozo, M., & Rut, T. (2025). Bayesian Data Fusion Framework for Soil Moisture Interpolation in Entre Ríos, Argentina: Analysis of Topographic Indices. Agricultural & Rural Studies, 3(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.59978/ar03020009

Abstract

The estimation of soil moisture contents on crop growth is the most important variable and, in many cases, determines yields. Many simulation models predict this variable by considering atmospheric conditions, crop water needs, and soil characteristics. In general, these models simulate soil moisture content for an average plant in the cultivated field without taking into account spatial variability. Relief is one of the characteristics that can explain this variability, so obtaining maps of soil moisture in the root zone has been addressed in this work through spatial interpolations obtained in sampling campaigns, together with the application of the Bayesian data fusion technique. In this work, soil moisture measurements were carried out in the first half of 2021 and the second half of 2022. With these data, several topographic indices were analyzed, finding that the inverse of the topographic wetness index and the digital terrain model best explain the spatial variability of soil moisture. Subsequently, data fusion techniques were applied by combining the results of the Ordinary Kriging interpolation method and these topographic indices. An analysis of the estimation errors was carried out using an independent set of data that did not participate in the spatial interpolations. It is observed that the application of the Bayesian data fusion method, considering these topographic indices, improves the soil moisture estimates compared to the use of the Ordinary Kriging interpolation method alone.

https://doi.org/10.59978/ar03020009
PDF
XML
HTML

References

Alizamir, M., Moradveisi, K., Othman Ahmed, K., Bahrami, J., Kim, S., & Heddam, S. (2025). An efficient data fusion model based on Bayesian model averaging for robust water quality prediction using deep learning strategies. Expert Systems with Applications, 261, 125499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125499

Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration - Guidelines for computing crop water requirements - FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/4/X0490E/x0490e00.htm

Álvarez-Mozos, J., Casalí, J., & González-Audícana, M. (2005). Teledetección radar como herramienta para la estimación de la humedad superficial del suelo en cuencas agrícolas [Radar remote sensing as a tool for surface soil moisture estimation in agricultural watersheds]. Revista de Teledetección, (23), 27–42.

https://www.aet.org.es/revistas/revista23/AET23-03.pdf

Beven, K. J., & Kirkby, M. J. (1979). A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 24(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667909491834

Bogaert, P., & Fasbender, D. (2007). Bayesian data fusion in a spatial prediction context: A general formulation. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 21, 695–709.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-006-0080-3

Bougeault, P., Noilhan, J., Lacarrère, P., Mascart, P. (1991a). An experiment with an advanced surface parameterization in a Mesobeta-Scale Model. Part I: Implementation. Monthly Weather Review, 119(10), 2358–2373.

https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119<2358:AEWAAS>2.0.CO;2

Bougeault, P., Bret, B., Lacarrère, P., Noilhan, J. (1991b). An experiment with an advanced surface parameterization in a Mesobeta-Scale Model. Part II: The 16 June 1986 Simulation. Monthly Weather Review,119(10), 2374–2392.

https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119<2374:AEWAAS>2.0.CO;2

Chen, F., & Dudhia, J. (2001a). Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity. Monthly Weather Review, 129(4), 569–585.

https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2

Chen, F., & Dudhia, J. (2001b). Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part II: Preliminary model validation. Monthly Weather Review, 129(4), 587–604.

https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0587:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2

Cressie, N. A. C. (1991). Statistics for spatial data. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119115151

Desbarats, A. J., Logan, C. E., Hinton, M. J., & Sharpe, D. R. (2002). On the kriging of water table elevations using collateral information from a digital elevation model. Journal of Hydrology, 225(1–4), 25–38.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00504-2

Despotovic, M., Nedic, V., Despotovic, D., & Cvetanovic, S. (2016). Evaluation of empirical models for predicting monthly mean horizontal diffuse solar radiation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, 246–260.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.058

Fasbender, D., Obsomer, V., Bogaert, P., & Defourny, P. (2009). Updating scarce high resolution images with time series of coarser images: A Bayesian data fusion solution. In N. Milisavljević (Ed.), Sensor and Data Fusion. I-Tech Education and Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5772/6581

Fasbender, D., Peeters, L., Bogaert, P., & Dassargues, A. (2008). Bayesian data fusion applied to water table spatial mapping. Water Resource Research, 44(12), W12422. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006921

Feng, F., Hu, X., Hu, L., Hu, F., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. (2009). Propagation mechanisms and diagnosis of parameter inconsistency within Li-Ion battery packs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 112, 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.042

Hirt, C. (2016). Digital Terrain Models. In E. Grafarend (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Geodesy (pp. 1–6). Springer Cham.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02370-0_31-1

Instituto Geográfico Nacional. (2017). Modelo Digital de Elevaciones Aerofotogramétrico de Río Paraná (Sector 3.5) [Computer software]. https://www.ign.gob.ar/NuestrasActividades/Geodesia/ModeloDigitalElevaciones/Mapa

Instituto Geográfico Nacional. (2019). Modelo Digital de Elevaciones de la República Argentina versión 2.0 [Computer software]. Dirección de Geodesia.

Isaaks, E. H., & Srivastava, R. M. (1989). An introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press.

Journel, A. G. (1989). Fundamentals of geoestatistics in five lessons. American Geophysical Union. https://doi.org/10.1029/SC008

Journel, A. G., & Huijbregts, C. (1978). Mining geostatistics. Academic Press.

Karumuri, S., McClure, Z. D., Strachan, A., Titus, M., & Bilionis, I. (2023). Hierarchical Bayesian approach to experimental data fusion: Application to strength prediction of high entropy alloys from hardness measurements. Computational Materials Science, 217, 111851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111851

Liao, K., Lai, X., Liu, Y., & Zhu, Q. (2016). Uncertainty analysis in near-surface soil moisture estimation on two typical land-use hillslopes. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 16, 2059–2071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1405-6

Li, D.-Q., Wang, L., Cao, Z.-J., & Qi, X.-H. (2019). Reliability analysis of unsaturated slope stability considering SWCC model selection and parameter uncertainties. Engineering Geology, 260, 105207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105207

Li, X., Xu, X., Liu, W., Xu, C., Zhang, R., & Wang, K. (2019). Prediction of profile soil moisture for one land use using measurements at a soil depth of other land uses in a karst depression. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 19, 1479–1489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-2138-5

Li, Y., & Vanapalli, S. K. (2021). A novel modeling method for the bimodal soil-water characteristic curve. Computers and Geotechnics, 138, 104318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104318

Mattivi, P., Franci, F., Lambertini, A., & Bitelli, G. (2019). TWI computation: A comparison of different open source GISs. Open Geospatial Data, Software and Standards, 4, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40965-019-0066-y

Moore, I. D., Grayson, R. B., & Ladson, A. R. (1991). Digital terrain modeling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrological Processes, 5(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360050103

Noilhan, J., & Planton, S. (1989). A simple parameterization of land surface processes for meteorological models. Monthly Weather Review, 117(3), 536–549. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<0536:ASPOLS>2.0.CO;2

Peeters, L., Fasbender, D., Batelaan, O., & Dassargues, A. (2010). Bayesian data fusion for water table interpolation: Incorporating a hydrogeological conceptual model in kriging. Water Resources Research, 46(8), W08532. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008353

Pleim, J. E., & Guilliam, R. (2009). An indirect data assimilation scheme for deep soil temperature in the Pleim–Xiu land surface model. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 48(7), 1362–1376. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC2053.1

Pleim, J. E., & Xiu, A. (2003). Development of a land surface model. Part II: Data assimilation. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 42(12), 1811–1822. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<1811:DOALSM>2.0.CO;2

Sayago, S., Ovando, G., & Bocco, M. (2017). Landsat images and crop model for evaluating water stress of rainfed soybean. Remote Sensing of Environment, 198, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.05.008

Smirnova, T. G., Brown, J. M., & Benjamin, S. G. (1997). Performance of different soil model configurations in simulting ground surface temperature and surface fluxes. Monthly Weather Review, 125(8), 1870–1884.

https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<1870:PODSMC>2.0.CO;2

Tocho, C. N., Antokoletz, E. D., & Piñón, D. A. (2020). Towards the realization of the International Height Reference Frame (IHRF) in Argentina. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, 152. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2020_93

Tóffoli, M. B., Hernández, J. P., Kindeknecht, L. E., Befani, M. R., & Bressan, M. P. (2022). Caracterización edáfica y topográfica para la determinación de ambientes en función del agua disponible [Edaphic and topographic characterization for the determination of environments according to available water.]. Revista Científica Agropecuaria, 25(2), 30–40.

https://pcient.uner.edu.ar/index.php/rca/article/view/1535

Wang, L., Cao, Z.-J., Li, D.-Q., Phoon, K.-K., & Au, S.-K. (2018). Determination of site-specific soil-water characteristic curve from a limited number of test data – A Bayesian perspective. Geoscience Frontiers, 9(6), 1665–1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2017.10.014

Weiss, A. (2001, July). Topographic position and landform analysis [Poster presentation]. ESRI users Conference, San Diego, CA.

Wilson, M. F. J, O’Connell, B., Brown, C., Guinan, J. C., & Grehan, A. J. (2007). Multiscale terrain analysis of multibeam bathymetry data for habitat mapping on the continental slope. Marine Geodesy, 30(1–2), 3–35.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01490410701295962

Wishmeier, W. H. & Smith, D. D. (1978). Predicting rainfall erosion Losses. A guide to conservation planning. Science and Education Administration, United States Department of Agriculture.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-A-PURL-gpo31516/pdf/GOVPUB-A-PURL-gpo31516.pdf

Xiu, A., & Pleim, J. E. (2001). Development of a land surface model. Part I: Application in a mesoscale meteorological model. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 40(2), 192–209.

https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<0192:DOALSM>2.0.CO;2

Zamani, M. G., Reza Nikoo, M., Niknazar, F., Al-Rawas, G., Al-Wardy, M., & Gandomi, A. H. (2023). A multi-model data fusion methodology for reservoir water quality based on machine learning algorithms and bayesian maximum entropy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 416, 137885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137885

Zhang, Q., Zhang, P., & Li, T. (2025). Information fusion for large-scale multi-source data based on the Dempster-Shafer evidence theory. Information Fusion, 115, 102754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102754

Zhao, T., Yang, Y., Xu, L., & Sun, P. (2025). Bayesian identification of the optimal soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC) model and reliability analysis of unsaturated loess slope from extremely sparse measurements. Engineering Geology, 349, 107975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.107975

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 César Augusto Aguirre, Guillermo Antonio Rondán, Carlos Germán Sedano, Macarena Cardozo, Tatiana Rut

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.