Does the Different Recipients of Land Fertility Protection Subsidy Influence the Scale and Efficiency of Village Land Circulation? Evidence from a Chinese Agricultural City
PDF
XML
HTML

Keywords

land fertility protection subsidy
cultivated land circulation
precise subsidy system
policy reform
China

How to Cite

Qiao, Z., Wang, M., Liu, T., & Cao, G. (2025). Does the Different Recipients of Land Fertility Protection Subsidy Influence the Scale and Efficiency of Village Land Circulation? Evidence from a Chinese Agricultural City. Agricultural & Rural Studies, 3(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.59978/ar03010002

Abstract

Agricultural subsidies offer significant support for the stability of global food security. With the backdrop of land circulation, the object of China’s land fertility protection subsidy is becoming increasingly ambiguous. Thus, outflower and inflower sense this subsidy as a profitable opportunity. Existing research has treated all agricultural subsidies as a whole, disregarding the distinct policy goals of different agricultural subsidies. The current study subdivides agricultural subsidies, with a focus on land fertility protection subsidies, which explores the relationship between village types dominated by subsidy recipients and the scale of land circulation. The current study, conducted on the village level, reflects individual farmers’ decisions influenced by such causes as village social structure and economic network. This study shows that in subsidized outflower-led villages, the scale of land circulation is considerably large, and the proportion of farmers exiting land to promote circulation is also markedly high. The land fertility protection subsidy often deviates from its intended policy goals. Furthermore, the impact of this distribution on land circulation varies among different entities in land transactions in different villages. Therefore, additional targeted and refined policy reforms are necessary to realize the original goal and effectively promote land fertility protection subsidies.

https://doi.org/10.59978/ar03010002
PDF
XML
HTML

References

Alauddin, M., & Tisdell, C. (1988). Impact of new agricultural technology on the instability of foodgrain production and yield: Data analysis for Bangladesh and its districts. Journal of Development Economics, 29(2), 199–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(88)90035-1

Andrews, M. (2021). The Farmer-Input Subsidy Program (FISP) does not service the poor. Development, 64, 288–291. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-021-00317-w

Ayala-Cantu, L., & Morando, B. (2020). Rental markets, gender, and land certificates: Evidence from Vietnam. Food Policy, 94, 101842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101842

Cui, N., Song, X., & Yu, X. (2014). Development constraints and suggestions for new agricultural production and management entities. Jiangxi Social Sciences, 34(3), 52–57.

Ellis, F. (2006). Peasant economics: Peasant household agricultural and agriculture development (J. Hu, Trans.). Shanghai People’s Publishing House. (Original work published 1988)

Fan, P., Mishra, A. K., Feng, S., Su, M., & Hirsch, S. (2023). The impact of China’s new agricultural subsidy policy on grain crop acreage. Food Policy, 118, 102472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102472

Fang, T., Zhou, Y., Wang, L., Shi, D., & Duan, X. (2024). The impact of multiplex relationships on households’ informal farmland transfer in rural China: A network perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 112, 103419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103419

Guo, L., Li, H., Cao, X., Cao, A., & Huang, M. (2021). Effect of agricultural subsidies on the use of chemical fertilizer. Journal of Environmental Management, 299, 113621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113621

Huang, J., Wang, X., Zhi, H., Huang, Z., & Rozelle, S. (2011). Subsidies and distortions in China’s agriculture: Evidence from producer-level data. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 55(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2010.00527.x

Ji, X., Qian, Z., & Ge, Y. (2015). Can agricultural subsidies promote the transfer of land contracting right: Based on the household survey data in the four provinces of JiangSu, HuBei, GuangXi and HeiLongJiang. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 36(05). https://doi.org/10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2015.05.006

Ji, X., & Zhang, H. (2021). How does social trust affect farmers’ land transfer-out behavior? China Land Science, 35(10), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.11994/zgtdkx.20211012.103035

Liao, H. (2012). The part-time work of farmers and its impact on the use rights transfer of the agricultural land. Journal of Management World, (05). https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2012.05.006

Lin, W., & Huang, J. (2021). Impacts of agricultural incentive policies on land rental prices: New evidence from China. Food Policy, 104, 102125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102125

Liu, Z., & Liu, L. (2016). Characteristics and driving factors of rural livelihood transition in the east coastal region of China: A case study of suburban Shanghai. Journal of Rural Studies, 43, 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.008

Qi, X., & Yang, Y. (2022). Rural household’s livelihood differentiation, land transfer and farmers’ income growth in western China. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 36(08), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2022.197

Qian, L., & Hong, M. (2016). Non-agricultural employment, land transfer and changes in agricultural production efficiency: An empirical analysis based on CFPS. China Rural Economy, (12), 2–16. https://jtp.cnki.net/bilingual/detail/html/ZNJJ201612001

Song, K., Liu, W., Wei, X., & Zhong, S. (2022). Influence of agricultural outsourcing operation on land transfer rent: An empirical analysis based on farmer survey data in 3 provinces (Municipality). Economic Geography, 42(03), 133–140 . https://doi.org/10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.03.014

Sun, F., & Lv, Y. (2012). Research on the income-increasing effect of my country’s agricultural subsidy policy in the central and western regions. Knowledge Economy, (02), 79–81. https://doi.org/10.15880/j.cnki.zsjj.2012.02.106

Tian, G., Duan, J., & Yang, L. (2021). Spatio-temporal pattern and driving mechanisms of cropland circulation in China. Land Use Policy, 100, 105118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105118

Veeck, G., & Shui, W. (2011). China’s quiet agricultural revolution: Policy and programs of the new millennium. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 52(2), 242–263. https://doi.org/10.2747/1539-7216.52.2.242

Wang, H., & Fang, Y. (2021). Livelihood transition and sustainability of rural households in mountainous area: A case of YaoZhan town in WeiChang county of HeBei Province. Economic Geography, 41(03), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.03.016

Wang, J., Xin, L., & Wang, Y. (2020). How farmers’ non-agricultural employment affects rural land circulation in China? Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30(3), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-020-1733-8

Wang, Q., Dang, H., & Yu, J. (2021). How does grain price affect land rent and revenue distribution: Based on rural household panel data from 2013 to 2019. Chinese Land Science, 35(8), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.11994/zgtdkx.20210817.091614

Wang, Y., Li, X., & Xin, L. (2017). The impact of agricultural labor force age on land transfer according to CHIP2013. Resource Science, 39(8), 1457–1468. https://doi.org/10.18402/resci.2017.08.03

Wang, Y., Li, X., Xin, L., Tan, M., & Jiang, M. (2018). Regional differences of land circulation in China and its drivers: Based on 2003–2013 rural fixed observation points data. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(3), 487–502. https://doi.org/10.11821/dlxb201803008

Xie, H., & Huang, Y. (2022). Impact of non-agricultural employment and land transfer on farmland abandonment behaviors of farmer: A case study in Fujian-Jiangxi-Hunan Mountainous Areas. Journal of Natural Resources, 37(2), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20220210

Xu, G., & Yu, J. (2023). Why does the rural land circulation develop in an internal way? Based on the perspective of “Instability” and “Social Security”. Rural Economy, (7), 36–43.

Xu, Q., Lu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2020). Have agricultural support and protection subsidies encouraged large-scale farmers to grow grain? An analysis based on data from fixed observation points of the ministry of agriculture and rural affairs in China. Chinese Rural Economy, (4), 15–33. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7101566978

Yi, F., & McCarl, B. (2018). Increasing the effectiveness of the Chinese grain subsidy: A quantitative analysis. China Agricultural Economic Review, 10(4), 538–557. https://doi.org/10.1108/caer-08-2016-0136

Yu, W., & Jensen, H. G. (2010). China’s agricultural policy transition: Impacts of recent reforms and future scenarios. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(2), 343–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00242.x

Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Bai, Y. (2019). Knowing and doing: The perception of subsidy policy and farmland transfer. Sustainability, 11(8), 15, 2393. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082393

Zheng, K. (2022). Rural land transfer incentive and supervision mechanism from the perspective of information asymmetry. Agricultural Economy, (05), 105–106.

Zhu, Y., & Yu, J. (2021). Impact of poverty alleviation relocation on farmers’ income and income gaps: A case study of 1680 households in Southern Shaanxi. Resource Science, 43(10), 2013–2025. https://doi.org/10.18402/resci.2021.10.07

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Zehao Qiao, Maojun Wang, Tao Liu, Guangzhong Cao

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.